this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
230 points (97.9% liked)
World News
437 readers
750 users here now
Rules:
- Be a decent person
- No spam
- Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
To the politicians, it's true. NASA is an easy(-ish) sell to the masses. There's a reason that the funding for NASA has stipulations on what districts certain projects are based in, and what companies make specific parts.
The space shuttle wasn't just one company, it was dozens and dozens of companies spread out across the country building high tech and high skill parts. The SLS was based heavily on the shuttle to keep those exact same districts employed with high skill (and high pay) work.
If congress was ok with NASA actually achieving things efficiently and on time, they'd just give them a budget and a goal, but that's not how things are funded.
We still get the end result, it's just an extremely wasteful way to get there.
Now look at how military projects are done. It's the same thing.
It's all a jobs program with a big focus on shoveling money towards companies that give a few tens of thousands of dollars towards their local representative.
This is what really annoys me about DOGE: we really do need to cut government spending severely as it is so inefficient, just we need to do it in a precise way that actually preserves the government’s function. Musk’s goal is to cut costs by just removing function altogether.