this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
518 points (90.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9379 readers
1393 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yanks are so accustomed to the idea that "more litres = more torque" that they actually can't imagine the amount of engineering that's gone in to smaller more efficient European and Japanese engines.

≈1hp per cc is pretty standard in modern cars but why invest in all that engineering when you can pour cheap gasoline down the throat of your 5 litre V8?

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The most popular pickup truck in the US is commonly bought with either a 2.7 liter turbo or 3.5 liter turbo v6, I think you're a bit behind the times.

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In 2018, the average engine in the UK was 1.61L, in 2022 in the US it is 3.42L (literally over twice the capacity), but yh, it's me that's behind the times.

Edit: Imagine getting down voted because someone doesn't like the data. No rebuttle, no counter data, nothing to show my data might be wrong, just burying it because you don't like it lmao

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're the one who pointed put the five liter v8 not me.

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's called hyperbole. Although I wouldn't say that it's an extreme exaggeration, the sentiment remains.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And you're still wrong. Most new cars in the US (other than sports cars) are using small turbocharged four cylinders. But keep trying to act like you know anything about cars in the US, it's fun to watch.

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You can tell me I'm wrong all you want, I showed recent data for average engine sizes in the UK and the US and all you have bought is conjecture.