Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55284 readers

360 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com

dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com

RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com

188

Be careful if you are using Roku, read the Privacy Policy. (docs.roku.com)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by TheMachineStops@discuss.tchncs.de to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

116 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Audio, electronic, visual, thermal, olfactory, or similar information.

Clarification: after a bit of research it seems the olfactory section pertains to CCPA California law, many places have olfactory in the privacy policy because it is required by the law. I can't believe we reached a point where we have to put olfactory in the privacy policy, but then again it won't be long before Smell-O-Vision becomes reality.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smell-O-Vision

They removed it, archived here: https://archive.ph/YYBuJ

Also have a California ip you get a different privacy policy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 week ago

I hear good things about the Ultra but I'll never buy one. The Premiere+ is still killing it and I don't think we'll need to replace it, and nobody in the family seems to care as much about this as I do so I don't think they'll be replacing the other Roku products in the home anytime soon.