this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
127 points (77.7% liked)
196
16790 readers
3102 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I feel like that could be casting too wide a net, though. Gender isn't an on or off, it's a series of gradients with no clear dividers.
For instance, what is considered gender nonconforming? Is it failing to meet the platonic gendered archetype of one's biological sex? I'd be willing to bet more people fall into that camp than not, especially among the cis-queer community.
I guess it depends on how they identify themself. If they consider themselves cis, then they almost certainly are cis? So the trans label does not apply. If they don't identify with the gender they were assigned at birth, then they are not cis. Therefore they are trans. No?
I'm not sure that "casting a net" of any size matters. Sure, you can say that there is a spectrum or gradient of gender. But I don't see how that changes anything. Being trans isn't a gender. It means that you no longer identify with the gender you were assigned at birth.
Of course, there might be some social stigma associated with being trans that may encourage some people to be offended by this take? Like if you're a non-binary person you might not really think of yourself as trans due to preconceived ideas and internalized transphobia. Of course I'm not going to go around calling someone trans if they don't identify themselves as trans anyway, but in my mind I was more answering the question in an attempt to be inclusionary towards people who may want to claim the label but aren't sure if they fit it.