You want to require hundreds of loving mothers to endanger their lives by insisting that they continue to carry doomed pregnancies long after doctors have proven the fetus cannot survive and is in excruciating pain even before it is born. Why? So you can force a 10-year-old to bear her rapist's child?

Go to hell, Kaya.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 39 points 6 days ago (3 children)

They all want to ban abortions but they don't want their tax dollars "wasted" on healthcare for the mother/child, on school lunch programs, on food banks, on welfare for struggling families or bear any responsibility at all for the wellbeing of the child after its born.

Seems to me they don't care about the children at all in most cases.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago

No and they’ll admit it. They just want to punish women for having sex.

If men gave birth, abortion would be a sacrament.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 8 points 6 days ago

I mean, this one specifically cares that a child might not be forced to birth her father-rapist's baby.

She seems to care quite a bit.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

All they care about is punishing “slutty leftist women” for having sex. They’re sure the laws will never negatively impact people they care about, just their enemies.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You missed an important bit. They want the ten year old raped and forced to carry their fathers child every year

[–] Riversedgeknight1@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I mean after a year the child is no longer 10, so at this point we are scarring a new child every year.

[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 days ago

That's the whole point. These people get off on human suffering.