this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
219 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

37719 readers
338 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
219
Greg Rutkowski Was Removed From Stable Diffusion, But AI Artists Brought Him Back - Decrypt (decrypt.co)
submitted 1 year ago by trashhalo@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
308 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Greg Rutkowski, a digital artist known for his surreal style, opposes AI art but his name and style have been frequently used by AI art generators without his consent. In response, Stable Diffusion removed his work from their dataset in version 2.0. However, the community has now created a tool to emulate Rutkowski's style against his wishes using a LoRA model. While some argue this is unethical, others justify it since Rutkowski's art has already been widely used in Stable Diffusion 1.5. The debate highlights the blurry line between innovation and infringement in the emerging field of AI art.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

One human artist can, over a life time, learn from a few artists to inform their style.

These AI setups [...] ALL the art from ALL the artists

So humans are slow and inefficient, what's new?

First the machines replaced hand weavers, then ice sellers went bust, all the calculators got sacked, now it's time for the artists.

There is no ethical stance for letting billion dollar tech firms hoover up all the art ever created to the try and remix it for profit.

We stand on the shoulders of generations of unethical stances.

[–] Pulse@dormi.zone 16 points 1 year ago

"other people were bad so I should be bad to."

Cool.

[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Yes, which is why we should try to do better.