Privacy

32400 readers

208 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Mozilla Firefox removes "Do Not Track" Feature support: Here's what it means for your Privacy (windowsreport.com)

submitted 1 week ago by TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://windowsreport.com/mozilla-firefox-removes-do-not-track-feature-support-heres-what-it-means-for-your-privacy/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] techfox@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don't quite get what changing the name would achieve in this scenario? I might be misunderstanding what you mean though. That being said, this was a suggested change 2 months ago within the community, so very unlikely to be any motivation behind it other than genuine change to clarify the feature. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1924493

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

Changes it to a more friendlier term, it saying copy without tracking is acknowledging that the site is using tracking data, where would the new terminology if you don't know what those parameters are then you just think it's a shorter link.

Neither changes the fact that it's happening in the first place, but one is directly addressing the elephant in the room where one is hiding under the rug

That being said reading that link, I do agree with some of the complaints that they have, but I still think it should have remained the same because that's exactly what the system does. It best attempts to remove tracking information from the URI