this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
196 points (100.0% liked)

news

23635 readers
883 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

i-cant

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bureaucrat@hexbear.net 84 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Related - I really hate how most people write articles. Halfway in and there's still no followup on the statement made by the headline. On top of that the headline is immediately repeated in the text and the premise is then restated several times.
We get the "bizzare rule" answered with the second to last sentence

So, if the informant called 911 instead of Crime Stoppers, they might be unable to make the claim.

This is what the article is about, but you can't get around to it until the very end because the article has to be written like an 8th graders essay

[–] underisk@hexbear.net 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s written that way to increase ad impressions. I hate it with every fiber of my being.

[–] Bureaucrat@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's definitely a large part of it, but it is also just the US style. I see it much less in non-US publications. It probably has something to do with the US having an abysmal reading level.

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 29 points 1 week ago

Because US publications rely more on ads to generate revenue

[–] buh@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago

everything a commodity, everything enshittified

[–] graymess@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's literally the opposite structure of the journalistic inverted pyramid format. Most relevant sentences go right at the top, further details below. Articles used to be intentionally written so you could stop reading at any point and walk away with most of the information.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 16 points 1 week ago

But that doesn't force you to stay on the page longer, generating half a cent of ad revenue for the publisher!

[–] Bureaucrat@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

Yeah, it's infuriating

[–] AmericaDeserved711@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

the crime stoppers thing is only about the $10k from NY. this is what the article says about the FBI's $50k

The rules are complicated, as they stipulate tipsters in with a chance of the FBI portion of the reward cannot nominate themselves.

This means the McDonald's worker will have to be put forward by an investigating agency, such as the Department of Defense or the FBI, which is then reviewed by an interagency committee.

If approved, the suggestion is passed on to the Secretary of State, who signs off on the final decision.

so the FBI has to put the rat's name forward and the secretary of state has to approve it. so what? I'm unconvinced they will screw over the rat given how public this story is, and fully convinced this article is clickbait trash