this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
130 points (98.5% liked)

GenZedong

4326 readers
118 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Islamist US proxies have captured Damascus. Bashar's government has fallen. Is it joever for the Axis of Resistence?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

~~And I'm still over here hoping things get turned around. Syria hosts Russia's only port in the Mediterranean, as well as airfields, allowing Russia to project power into the Middle East and Africa. So far there have been no reports of Russia abandoning its bases (although some ships reportedly left).~~

~~The smart move for SAA would have been to retreat to a defensible position and then launch an insurgency against HTS. HTS is deemed a terrorist organisation and they do not enjoy the broad popular support like the Taliban do in Afghanistan, so they do not have the means for a protracted war or sustained conflict, meanwhile Russia can continue supplying SAA through the ports/airfields.~~

~~This would force the US/West to openly give support to people they have labeled terrorists, which would be a lose-lose for the US.~~

~~Putin said Russia isn't going to help SAA if they're not willing to fight for their country. Maybe I'm being naive, but I'm wondering if its a ploy to make SAA appear weak, Sun Tzu and all that.~~

~~Assad's family left weeks ago, so this wasn't such a surprise. Also, from what I've seen/read, the SAA didn't abandon equipment like the Afghan Army did when Taliban advanced. The SAA seems to have retreated with their vehicles, there is no sign of a rout. Remember, when Ukraine started pushing hard and fast on Kherson and Kharkov the Russians also abandoned their positions and retreated, giving up a lot of territory; Western media said it was over for Russia then.~~

~~The thought of Assad/Syria falling saddens me, but I'm not willing to give into doomerism yet.~~

Apparently it's over. Fucking sucks.

Still not giving into doomerisms though. HTS is a gang of thugs whose only "success" so far, that the Western media has been able to dig up, was them running Idlib "sort of, kind of okay" (and probably with Turkey's help) while recognising that they led a terror campaign against Kurds, Shia Muslims and anyone who opposed them. I don't think the people of Syria will accept HTS so easily. I could be wrong (again), but it gives me some hope that the HTS rule might be very short-lived.

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

. Also, from what I've seen/read, the SAA didn't abandon equipment like the Afghan Army did when Taliban advanced.

That's incorrect, the SAA did abandon a ton of equipment, I think over 200 SAA tanks, including over 60 T-72s and 6 T-90s, were captured by various rebel factions undamaged. Over 900 pieces of equipment abandoned in total.

Twitter Source

Xcancel mirror

Nitter mirror

[–] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 weeks ago

I think over 200 SAA tanks, including over 60 T-72s and 6 T-90s, were captured by various rebel factions undamaged. Over 900 pieces of equipment abandoned in total.

Fuck. But will it be enough to hold a country embroiled in civil war, especially one as large as Syria?

[–] FamousPlan101@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The smart move for SAA would have been to retreat to a defensible position and then launch an insurgency against HTS. HTS is deemed a terrorist organisation and they do not enjoy the broad popular support like the Taliban do in Afghanistan, so they do not have the means for a protracted war or sustained conflict, meanwhile Russia can continue supplying SAA through the ports/airfields.

Wasn't just HTS, they were being attacked from rebels in 2 other directions, from the South and Southeast. The rebels in the south had simliarly negotiated with Assad, but just a couple days ago started their offensive towards Damascus. Meanwhile cities which Assad held for years in the last civil war fell in days to HTS.

https://lemmygrad.ml/post/6428801

The SAA didn’t abandon equipment like the Afghan Army did when Taliban advanced. The SAA seems to have retreated with their vehicles, there is no sign of a rout.

Some of it was salvaged by crossing into the Iraq border, but I've seen reports that it was also abandoned. https://x.com/adam7867863/status/1864306554314342850 https://x.com/MyLordBebo/status/1865594048284680445

Edit:

It's official, Assad resigns. - Russian Foreign Ministry

https://www.reuters.com/world/russia-says-syrias-assad-has-left-country-given-orders-peaceful-power-handover-2024-12-08/

[–] multitotal@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago

Well, I guess that's it then.