this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
247 points (86.4% liked)

Comic Strips

12974 readers
2122 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TechieDamien@lemmy.ml 32 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Don't know why you are being down voted. You are correct. There is a difference between a square root and the solutions of x^2^ = n.

[–] Acters@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, square root implies absolute numbers. You need to manually multiply by -1 to get the other solution to x^2

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

No?

In mathematics, a square root of a number x is a number y such that y² = x; in other words, a number y whose square (the result of multiplying the number by itself, or y ⋅ y) is x. For example, 4 and −4 are square roots of 16 because 4² = ( − 4 )² = 16.

Wikipedia


Edit: I'm wrong lol, there is a difference between the square root function, which accepts two results, and the square root, or principal square root, which is a unique positive number

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

So close yet so far. If only you had read ONE more paragraph.

Every nonnegative real number x has a unique nonnegative square root, called the principal square root or simply the square root (with a definite article, see below), which is denoted by √x where the symbol "√" is called the radical sign or radix.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This sentence made no sense to me as it directly contradicted the previous one. But it's just a confusion on my part between the function called square root, which confusingly outputs two different numbers called "square roots", and "the" number called square root; I've edited my comment. Thanks for correcting me!

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I see how that can happen. Very confusing to have the same name for two things differentiated only by the use of a definite or indefinite article.

[–] wdx@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Look at the inverse of the square root function, f(x)=x² (https://www.desmos.com/calculator/2v5gzbhru8)

You can get the sqrt of a given y by looking at the x axis. E.g. the value of y=4 has two solutions, x=2 and x=-2. This however does not mean that the sqrt of -4 is also 2! If you look at graph you can see that there are no solutions for y less than 0.

sqrt(-1) , sqrt(-2) (i ill omit imaginary numbers here) and so on do not have a solution. There is nothing you can replace with such that x × x is < 0 because multiplying two negatives always nets a positive.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

I really don't like the sqrt shorthand.

They knew.