this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
233 points (95.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9788 readers
906 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

This one might be a little unfair to blanket stamp with FuckCars - this is a crazy compact way of joining so many different arterial roads and funneling them into a single bridge (one that goes over a river, not just an overpass). It's also crazily walk/bike-able (seriously, there's more space than I've ever seen on a sidewalk in the states, on both sides of the bridge), and has lane restrictions for transit at peak load times. While gorgeously breathtaking in it's monstrosity, it's certainly one of the better car-brain designs out there.

[–] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fair enough. It's better than the interchanges in Austin TX by far

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago

I've either driven over the one pictured when I moved from Tokyo to where I live now or a very similar one, and have also driven in Austin. I can 100% confirm it sucks less here. As a bonus, no gun-flashing roadragers here!

[–] galmuth 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Even though it looks kinda cool and cyberpunk, it's still gross that there's so many roads completely built over a city where people work and live, with a No Cycling sign suggesting cyclists and pedestrians are second class citizens here.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The other big problem of vertical congestion like this is air pollution. I once looked at living close to a raised highway like this, but you’d more or less have to hold your breath every time you return home.

[–] anothermember@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

To be fair Tokyo (where this is) is pretty cycle and pedestrian friendly in general.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, what grosses me out is just thinking of all the microplastic particles that cars put in the air. Our right to clean air should supercrde their right to convenience

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

I was thinking the same thing. This doesn't show off the material problems with car infrastructure, and it makes it look cool.

Even in the most solarpunk utopian vision of the future I'd expect to be able to find some angle of infrastructure to photograph that makes it appear techno-dystopian, and even then it would still look cool.