this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
258 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13594 readers
667 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Damn dude that's sick as hell! Is my vote

https://xcancel.com/deanbphillips/status/1864331752837153152

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 94 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Aww, that's cute, he thinks it's still 2002 and ”killing terrorists” is a thought terminating debate move instead of the empty rhetoric used to justify anything that everyone's been seeing through for 20 years.

[–] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

About two years ago I was sat in the audience for a talk by a very earnest, experienced speaker addressing the challenges of aid work in various places across the globe and they (briefly) mentioned terrorism as one aspect of a compilation alongside war. And I swear my mind basically just skipped over it for a second as if rolling it's eyes. It took a minute for me to conciously remind myself that in this instance it was being used correctly and earnestly. After an adult lifetime of it being a facile buzzword through The Troubles, followed by the West's global profit-backed religious crusades, the word terrorism reflexively indicated that this wasn't going to be a serious point by a serious person and I could skip the next part.

I wonder for how many more, especially of the late Gen X to millennial to now generations, hear it the same way? Not as a thought terminating cliché, but an instant indicator that you're desperately scaremongering and totally full of shit.