this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
211 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10179 readers
318 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Justice Samuel Alito said in an interview that Congress does not have the authority to regulate the Supreme Court, pushing back against Democratic efforts to mandate stronger ethics rules for the justices. Alito argued that the Constitution does not give Congress the power to regulate the Supreme Court. While Chief Justice John Roberts has also questioned Congress's ability to act, he was not as definitive as Alito. Some Democrats rejected Alito's reasoning, arguing that the Supreme Court should be subject to checks and balances. The ethics push comes after recent revelations about undisclosed trips and other ethics issues involving several Supreme Court justices.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] verdare@beehaw.org 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the Constitution does not give Congress the power to regulate the Supreme Court

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think the Constitution gives the Supreme Court most of the authority that it has given itself either.

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 10 points 1 year ago

That’s correct. The Court decided in Marbury v. Madison that it ought to have the power of judicial review. Lo and behold…

[–] mister_monster@monero.town 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] fades@beehaw.org 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, they do not stand corrected because what they wrote was correct, not corrected by someone else

You stand corrected when you make a statement and someone says no, it’s xyz. You stand corrected, acknowledging your mistake