this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
51 points (98.1% liked)

UK Politics

3114 readers
375 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

All of the Conservatives who voted, 78 of them, opposed the idea

I'm mildly surprised by that, since FPTP actively hurt them at the last election.

[–] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

It might have lost the party the election

But the rich party donors don't actually mind their party losing as long as they also control the second party well enough to avoid regulations, taxes, or any modicum of responsibility towards society.

FPTP isn't about which party wins, it's about reducing the power of the electorate far enough that change only happens with the content of the rich.

[–] Rogue 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's only temporary. Once they've bribed farage sufficiently he'll disband the reform party and the tories will return to dominating elections through the corruption of FPTP. The absurd thing is Labour refuse to accept this and will blunder on refusing to accept we need a proportional electoral system

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Labour have just won a 174 seat majority on 34% of the vote with FPTP.

There would be no benefit to them in changing the system.

[–] Rogue 1 points 14 hours ago

In my opinion labour's victory was due to the utter incompetence of the conservatives and unexpected success of the reform party. I don't believe these circumstances will be repeated so labour will get demolished as usual in the next election. The same applies to the lib dems getting 70 seats under FPTP. It won't be repeated so they must work together to repair the damn system

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Oh, there is. There is no guarantee this will be repeated.

[–] mannycalavera 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah but they'd get fucked with PR.

Labour less so but they would still prefer FPTP over PR for party reasons. And without one or both of these large groups nothing will change. 😞