this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
836 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59772 readers
4350 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m saying that your router and access point should be separate devices anyway, especially if you don’t want to replace said router.

My router doesn’t have wireless at all. I have a dedicated WiFi 6 access point for that, if I want to go up to a newer standard I just replace the AP.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, fair enough. I'm kind of an intermediate user, because when I think of Access Point and Router, I think of the same device. But yet, I'm definitely a big advocate of open source software and hardware. But I do not self-host very much.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Less about open source, more of just a practical stance. The thing about networking is that standards change all the time, and it’s better to have a single device serve a single role on the network than to cram all those functions into a combo box.

So an ideal network has a separate router, switch, and access point. Ideally two of each in redundant configurations but that’s not required for most people.