this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
153 points (90.1% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3525 readers
360 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This one’s not just a population density map in disguise, is it?

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] SwordInStone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

if only the OP could read

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Still, big cities seem to have a lower rate so I wonder if there's something about the methodology that depends on population density

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 1 points 7 hours ago

Definitely more resources in a number of ways (healthcare, social programs, etc.), Possibly more community depending upon how rural an area you're comparing to (and possibly how long that and surrounding families have been there).

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

big cities are generally better to live in (at least in the USA) since there are more amenities there and people can actually get to them reliably without a car.