this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
374 points (95.6% liked)

Not The Onion

12390 readers
1377 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 122 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Those days are over sadly. Ticketing and venues are largely consolidated now.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 55 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It's got to be the ticketing taking too much vig, right? I hear these stories about $300 tickets, I haven't been to a concert in years but in the 2000's touring was where the money came from. With $45+ticketmaster tickets.

They have to be sucking all the money out at point of sale

[–] astanix@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just look at ticket prices on ticketmaster for a US show and compare it to the cost of an international venue.

When I was pricing David Gilmour it was literally cheaper to buy a plane ticket and fly from NY to Rome and go to the show there than get the worst seats in Madison Square Garden.

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

Because Ticketmaster and it’s venues are a monopoly. Pearl Jam tried to warn us 30 years ago.

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

The ticketing company owns all the venues now and they own the secondhand scalper sites so they allocate a bunch of tickets to the secondhand site and mark them way up plus they can charge whatever they want for the venue and only pay the artist what they were contracted for

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's also probably one of the few ways for artists to have an income that their lable/manager/publisher/whoever the fuck else doesn't take a huge cut of. Add in ticket master and company and they're fucked.

Those contracts they sign can be fucking brutal. I'm not familiar with either of those artists but it's a common enough problem in that industry.

[–] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 6 points 2 days ago

Was ever thus, init.

The options are 1) Charge less and sell more, or 2) Charge much more and sell less, but make up more than the difference in how much more they charge.

They always, always take option 2 because they’re shitheads who feel like they have a legal duty to put the shareholders above the customers.