this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
124 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
4723 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
124
How decentralized is Bluesky really? (dustycloud.org)
submitted 1 day ago by garretble@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This is a pretty great, long form post about the structure of Bluesky, and how it's largely kinda pretending to be decentralized at the moment. I'm not trying to make a dig at it. I've enjoyed the platform myself for a while, but it's good to learn more about how it actually works.

This article was shared on Mastodon via its author here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 17 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I saw a comment the other day about this saying you'd need like over 4terrabytes of storage to run a BlueSky instance of your own, and that it's growing every day. That's fucking insane.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

I thought it takes that much storage to run a relay, not an instance. (Which Bluesky calls a "Personal Data Store.")

Maybe this is just my ignorance showing, but this seems like a really archaic way to design something like this in 2024. Dump all the data into a central repository and then have clients pull from that?

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That’s addressed in the blog post. She was saying it was currently 5TB and growing. So anyone wanting to set up a server would need to pay for that space, and that’s not cheap.

[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

It's also not, like, unattainable

But it's definitely well beyond what any hobbyist is going to set up in a whim

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago

Meh, homelab storage and FTTH are reasonably cheap. Or rented iron like Hetzner.