food
Welcome to c/food!
The place for all kinds of food discussion: from photos of dishes you've made to recipes or even advice on how to eat healthier.
Animal liberation is essential to any leftist movement.
Image posts containing animal products must have nfsw tag and add a content warning (CW:Meat/Cheese/Egg) ,and try to post recipes easily adaptable for vegan.
Posts that contain animal products may receive informative comments regarding animal liberation, and users may disengage by telling a commenter that the original poster wants to, "disengage".
Off-topic, Toxic, inflammatory, aggressive debating, and meta (community rules, site rules, moderators,etc ) posts or comments will be removed.
Please be sure to read the Code of Conduct and remember we are all comrades here. Share all your delicious food secrets.
Ingredients of the week: Mushrooms,Cranberries, Brassica, Beetroot, Potatoes, Cabbage, Carrots, Nutritional Yeast, Miso, Buckwheat
Cuisine of the month:
view the rest of the comments
Isn't the purpose of the rule to avoid people having to look at parts of corpses?
They list eggs and cheese as well.
Yes, those are also things that are maybe easily discernable and visually evoke carnism in their pure form, but as an ingredient in something else are beyond perception.
I could post something that doesn't have any noticeable animal product ingredients, not name the ingredients, and omit that there is egg yolk in the sauce. Or I could make a batch of beanis, containing no animal products, and say that there is a yogurt in it, pretty post with a CW on top.
Looking at something that secretly contains an animal product is not the same thing as eating something that secretly contains an animal product. It's one thing to say "we shouldn't glorify eating animal products, or force vegans to look at them, by making them visible". It's another to claim that something invisible has the same effect. At a certain point we will have to ask whether a fig bar needs a CW.
. It's not really visible apart from the shine, but I list it as the third ingredient in the recipe. It's more of a content warning for that part.
I was going to say something more serious, but I really only want to remark that it's kind of weird you care so much about this corner case.
This is my one siterule that I'm oddly critical of, and have been since it was made (I will still follow the spirit of it, which I am in support of)