this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
197 points (99.5% liked)

news

23577 readers
787 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Image is from this article.


Thank you to @carpoftruth@hexbear.net for covering my position as Supreme Dictator of the Goddamn News while I was moving and getting set up in my new home in a top secret Kremlin-funded bunker five hundred feet below the ground. Our regularly scheduled programming returns this week.


On October 9th, Daniel Chapo won the Mozambique general election with about 70% of the vote. Chapo is the head of FRELIMO, the Marxist-Leninist party of Mozambique's liberation, which fought an internal anti-communist resistance called RENAMO which was backed by Rhodesia and apartheid South Africa; Frelimo won in 1975. However, as the USSR fell, Frelimo began to allow elections inside Mozambique, and has ruled the country with significant majorities in each election ever since.

The main opposition party inside Mozambique is Podemos, which is led by Venancio Mondlane, a former member of Renamo and trained inside the USA. He alleges that his polling figures predicted a majority win for him, not Frelimo, and has accused Chapo of electoral fraud. There have been the usual slogans about how they yearn for freedom. The EU, of course, "witnessed irregularities." As @WilsonWilson@hexbear.net has pointed out, Mozambique has massive undeveloped gas fields and is outsourcing the development process to France, Norway, the UK, and the USA, while mysterious Islamist groups have popped up to cause chaos in the exact regions which have the gas, slowing the process of actually developing those gas fields. Overall, it appears to be a cookie-cutter colour revolution attempt by the imperial core designed to install a comprador for cheaper resources. Its proximity to BRICS+ member South Africa may also be significant, noting the colour revolution in Bangladesh earlier this year exerting influence near India and China.

Protestors have been battling against the police and government since late October, resulting in dozens of deaths and injuries as well as massive disruption, as the government has intermittently blocked access to the internet and social media. As of today, calm appears to be returning, with border crossings beginning to reopen.


Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week's thread is here.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 49 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Maduro praises Lula's statement and temperature drops between Brazil and Venezuela - Brasil de Fato (Portuguese Only)

According to Brazil's President, the country should not meddle in the internal affairs of its neighbors; 'A Point for Lula', said Maduro

Article

The President of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, on Monday (11) praised the statement made by the head of the Brazilian Executive, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT), who said he respected Venezuelan institutions. According to Maduro, the speech was a “wise” reflection by the PT leader and he added: “Point in favor of Lula”.

“I agree with Lula. Each country has to find its own way of resolving its issues, its conflicts, its problems. Brazil with its institutions and its sovereign national dynamic, and Venezuela with our sovereign dynamic. I think that's a wise reflection on Lula's part. I could say: Point in favor of Lula,” said the Venezuelan on his weekly program Con Maduro +.

In an interview, Lula had said on Sunday (10) that he would not question the Supreme Court's decision in other countries so that this criticism would not spill over into Brazil in the future. The Venezuelan Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ) validated the results of the July 28 elections, which saw Nicolás Maduro win with 51.97% of the vote against 43.18% for opposition leader Edmundo González Urrutia.

“I don't have the right to question the Supreme Court of another country because I don't want any country to question my Supreme Court, even when it makes mistakes. Even when it does what it did to me and doesn't allow me to be a candidate in 2018,” said Lula.

According to the Brazilian president, Maduro is “Venezuela's problem” and each president should take care of their own country, without interfering in the affairs of their neighbors. He also stressed that he cannot “fight” with other countries in the region, such as Nicaragua and Venezuela itself.

“I've learned that we have to be very careful when dealing with other countries and other presidents. I think Maduro is Venezuela's problem, not Brazil's problem. I want Venezuela to live well, for them to look after their people with dignity. I'll take care of Brazil, Maduro will take care of him, the Venezuelan people will take care of Maduro, and I'll take care of Brazil. And let's move on. Because I can't keep worrying either. Fighting with Nicaragua, fighting with Venezuela, fighting with I don't know who. I just have to try to fight to make this country work,” said Lula

Lula's speech was also praised by the Venezuelan interior minister, Diosdado Cabello. According to him, “it's never too late” to recognize that this is an important position for the region.

“I would like the whole world to understand this before saying anything about Venezuela. Venezuela's internal affairs are resolved by Venezuelans. There are people who let it slide and then say, 'oh, I was wrong.' We must respect our country and it's good that President Lula is taking this position now. It's never too late,” he said.

He also said that Venezuela will respect the internal decision of all countries, including the United States, which has been imposing sanctions against Venezuelans for seven years. According to Cabello, the US has its own system and decides how its elections are. “If you ask me if there is democracy there, for me there isn't,” he said.

The tension between the two neighboring countries began in the Venezuelan electoral race. The Brazilian Superior Electoral Court (TSE) was going to send two observers to monitor the election, but backed out after Maduro claimed that the Brazilian ballot boxes “are not audited”. Instead of observers, the Brazilian government sent its special advisor, Celso Amorim, to Caracas during the elections.

Maduro was elected for a third term with 51.97% of the votes against 43.18% for the opposition candidate Edmundo González Urrutia. The Venezuelan opposition contested the result and claimed to have collected more than 80% of the copies of the electoral records and, according to the right-wing coalition Plataforma Unitaria, this would guarantee Urrutia's victory.

This, coupled with reports of a hacker attack on Venezuela's electoral system, led Maduro to call for an investigation by the courts. The electoral body delayed the release of the detailed results on the grounds of hacker activity, the Venezuelan Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ) investigated the alleged attacks, collected all the electoral material from the body and heard 9 of the 10 candidates who contested the ballot. Only Edmundo González Urrutia was absent.

The Brazilian government has begun to work with Colombia and Mexico to mediate in the Venezuelan electoral issue. The three governments have issued two joint notes calling for the CNE to publish the electoral records and not the country's courts. The Venezuelan Supreme Court validated Maduro's election and asked for the disaggregated results to be published within 30 days. However, more than three months after the election, the results have still not been published and the electoral body's website is still down.

Lula then oscillated between calling for the situation to be resolved internally, suggesting that new elections be held and saying that he would not recognize Maduro's victory if the results of the minutes were not published and, consequently, his victory at the polls were independently verified.

The relationship between Venezuela and Brazil stabilized momentarily until the BRICS summit, held in Kazan, Russia, from 22 to 24 October. At the summit, the Venezuelan government had hoped to be incorporated into the group as a “partner state”, but was left off the list of 13 new members by a veto from Brazil. Itamaraty's decision outraged Venezuelans.

The reason for the veto was not publicly explained by Lula's government. The president did not attend the event and sent his foreign minister, Mauro Vieira, to lead the delegation. Caracas claims that the decision was a “stab in the back” and that the Brazilian government's “meddling” measure is a way of interfering in local politics.

At a hearing in the Chamber of Deputies, Amorim stressed that the issue of the ballot should be resolved by Venezuelans and that Brazil does not recognize the election of President Nicolás Maduro until the disaggregated results are presented. Amorim did not clearly explain the veto in the BRICS. First, he said that it is necessary to be a country with influence and that represents the region, something that, for him, Venezuela does not fulfill. Secondly, he mentioned the unease between the Brazilian and Venezuelan governments.

In response to the special advisor's remarks, the Venezuelan government summoned the Venezuelan ambassador to Brazil, Manuel Vadell, for consultations. In a statement, Caracas said that the measure was taken after Amorim's “interventionist and crude” statements. The Venezuelan Foreign Ministry also summoned Brazil's chargé d'affaires in Caracas to express its “rejection” of the statements made by representatives of the Brazilian government in relation to the country's electoral process.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wasn't Lula the one who vetoed Venezuela being in BRICS. I'm so confused by what's going on over there.

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Brazil will be the leader of BRICS next year (Russia is the current leader), Maduro still wants to join and maintain good relations with Brazil due to possible new attacks from the US' new goverment. Brazil will probably not veto Venezuela again, as they have nothing to gain from another veto (there will be no elections in Brazil or Venezuela next year). Besides, I read somewhere (I think it was in Brazil de Fato or Telesur) that Maduro was speficially attacking Brazilians diplomats (a right-wing diplomat that works in Russia and, not even joking, met with Brazilian-Japanese V-Tubers in a Brazilian funded event) and not Lula or the Workers' Party, I doubt this and Nicaragua's bad relations with Brazil would have lasted long.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah makes sense. Is Brazil not friendly with Venezuela? Do they use the same standard communist bad language as the US so an association with them hurts Lula's re-election?

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Is Brazil not friendly with Venezuela?

Currently? Yes, Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia are friendly towards Venezuela.

Do they use the same standard communist bad language as the US so an association with them hurts Lula's re-election?

Yes, Lula generally needs the support of liberals in Congress and to elect some of his allies. Liberals really don't like Venezuela and generally badmouth it or simply refuse to do anything to help it. Conservatives and the far right are supported by the MSM narrative that Venezuela is an evil communist dictatorship, and conservatives have the opportunity to say that Lula and the left are like Bolsonaro and the far right, because Bolsonaro was friends with the Saudis.

And they think Venezuela is a brutal regime like the Saudis, so in this way they portray Lula as a radical like Bolsonaro and present themselves as moderates (they're not, they want to destroy the public schools and the health system). They even say idiotic things like they used to say on Fox News, Castrochavismo. They say Lulapetismo, they want to destroy Lula's image and the image of the Workers' Party before the public. Before Venezuela, they used to talk about Cuba and Fidel Castro. But I feel that, in recent years, no one is talking about Venezuela anymore, probably because the US has stopped thinking much about it after it failed so many times to remove Maduro from power.

[–] Commiejones@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lula be like:

geordi-no "I stand with any national leader in their fight against American political interference and far-right coups"

geordi-yes I don't have the right to question the Supreme Court of another country, because I don't want any country to question my Supreme Court, even when it makes mistakes. Even when it does as it did with me, not allowing me to be a candidate in 2018

Fucking civility pilled loser. Like yeah lula is better than bolosnaro but god what a fucking liberal.

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

I guess this talking is a way Lula found to appease both Venezuela and the Brazilian Supreme Court (They are not good people, but the Congress and Senate, who are under far-right control, keep attacking and annoying the Supreme Court which leads to the Supreme Court sometimes doing good things for the wrong motives, like fucking with Bolsonaro and protecting minorities).

[–] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But he’ll sink the brics application? Brazilians pls explain

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Brazil will be the leader of BRICS next year (Russia is the current leader), Maduro still wants to join and maintain good relations with Brazil due to possible new attacks from the US' new goverment. Brazil will probably not veto Venezuela again, as they have nothing to gain from another veto (there will be no elections in Brazil or Venezuela next year).

[–] bbnh69420@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Was Lula’s electoral position so fraught that something as small as Venezuela entering brics could sink him?

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Not him (Lula himself is popular, but he struggles to give this popularity to his own party and allies), his political allies (party coalition, the Liberals that usually support Lula and vote for him, really hate Venezuela due to the MSM being Pro-US)