Programming

17484 readers

238 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

205

The US government wants devs to stop using C and C++ (www.theregister.com)

submitted 1 week ago by lemmee_in@lemm.ee to c/programming@programming.dev

91 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In my understanding, you can't interface with the C abi without using an unsafe block.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

I think there are some crates that wrap the unsafe code for you, e.g. https://github.com/rodrimati1992/abi_stable_crates/ (I haven't ever tried it).

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

You can just use an unsafe block though. Or make a thin wrapper that is just safe functions that inside just have an unsafe block with the C ABI function.

Even if rust had a stable ABI, you would still need that unsafe block.