this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
189 points (91.6% liked)

Individual Climate Action

155 readers
1 users here now

Discuss actions that we can directly take as individuals to reduce environmental harm.

related communities (decentralized only)

somewhat closely related to individual action:

less closely related to individual action:

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

You should be every day voting with your wallet to prevent money flowing into the wrong hands. Boycott these ALEC members who non-stop fund the republican war chests:

  • FedEx
  • UPS
  • Motorola
  • Anheuser Busch
  • American Express
  • Bose
  • Chevron
  • Marlboro
  • Sony
  • Texaco
  • Boeing (fly on Airbus instead, see how to boycott Boeing)

Quit driving. It’s not just the fuel burn that harms the environment. When you buy fuel, you fund the oil companies who fund republicans. Trump’s 4th biggest cash source came from oil giants. There is nothing worse for the environment than republicans.

Find out which companies funded Trump’s war chest directly, and boycott them.

list of most notable Pro-Trump lobbyists (who funded them? We need to follow the money)Make America Great Again Inc SuperPAC $331,464,578
America PAC (Texas) SuperPAC $130,300,020
Preserve America PAC SuperPAC $106,088,226
Save America Leadership PAC $91,695,410
Right for America SuperPAC $68,457,574
Turnout for America SuperPAC $25,390,000
Duty to America PAC SuperPAC $20,650,000
Make America Great Again PAC Leadership PAC $16,732,669
SAG PAC SuperPAC $16,412,306
Maha Alliance SuperPAC $4,632,637
Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund SuperPAC $1,848,824
Defend Us PAC SuperPAC $1,544,688
CatholicVote.org SuperPAC $1,432,742
Committee to Defeat the President Carey $536,739
Concerned Americans for America SuperPAC $478,293
Sticker PAC SuperPAC $450,000
American Resolve PAC (Virginia) SuperPAC $442,684
FOUR MORE YEARS PAC SuperPAC $267,216
Greater Georgia Action SuperPAC $242,441
College Republicans of America SuperPAC $85,409
Billboards 47 Swing States SuperPAC $81,694
Asians Making America Great Again SuperPAC $77,064
Win USA PAC SuperPAC $46,807
Great America PAC Carey $34,822
America First Veterans PAC SuperPAC $30,000
New Gen 47 Carey $20,397
Wilberforce PAC SuperPAC $5,000
People & Politics PAC SuperPAC $1,981
Make America Great Again, Again! SuperPAC $200
America First Action SuperPAC $36

There is likely a long list of banks. Banks love republicans in general. We need to get that list and get people off those banks. People should be using cash anyway since banks finance fossil fuels, private prisons, and republicans. In the very least, if you give a shit and you are not a deadbeat then you will avoid using these banks.

(edit) Home Depot, Disney, …, probably others. That’s a long article not an easy list so work required.

grab your wallet is an election cycle out of date, and sadly it’s in Google docs (so use Tor). But it still has a bit of relevance.

Europeans— You can take these actions too. You couldn’t vote for Kamala but you always have the power to vote with your feet. The first ALEC list is international entities.

US folks— In addition to the ALEC list at the top, the following are also ALEC members which (I believe) are US-only:

  • CenturyLink
  • Charter Communications
  • Farmers/Foremost
  • Geico
  • LMG (Liberty Mutual/Safeco)
  • Nationwide Insurance
  • PNC bank
  • StateFarm
  • TimeWarner

(update) Dug up a list of companies that are said to finance AIPAC, a PAC who targets democrats who go against Israel. It blows a huge amount of money on the right-wing candidate which apparently works every time. It’s so effective there is a verb for it: AIPAC-ed. I have not vetted the list but when I look at it it’s all usual suspects of corps I already boycott.

AIPAC feeders to boycottIntel Corporation
Microsoft Corporation
Google (Alphabet Inc.)
IBM (International Business Machines Corporation)
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
HP Inc. (Hewlett Packard)
Apple Inc.
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Facebook, Inc.
Oracle Corporation
Qualcomm Incorporated
Pfizer Inc.
Johnson & Johnson
General Electric Company
Coca-Cola Company
Procter & Gamble Co.
Verizon Communications Inc.
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Amazon.com, Inc.
Dell Technologies Inc.
General Motors Company
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Citigroup Inc.
American Express Company
Visa Inc.
Mastercard Incorporated
Walmart Inc.
The Walt Disney Company
Netflix Inc.
Adobe Inc.
Electronic Arts Inc.
Airbnb, Inc.
Uber Technologies Inc.
Lyft, Inc.
Tesla, Inc.
Ford Motor Company
The Coca-Cola Company
PepsiCo, Inc.
Nestlé S.A.
Unilever PLC
The Procter & Gamble Company
Johnson & Johnson
Colgate-Palmolive Company
The Hershey Company
Mars, Incorporated
The Coca-Cola Company
PepsiCo, Inc.
Nestlé S.A.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

If your premise is that both POTUS candidates are equally bad (nonsense¹, but I’ll play along for a second), then your most foolish move is to give one of them the POTUS and also give that same party both branches of Congress.

The thread title should have made it clear that the actions herein are for climate activists who intend to support the democratic party. So what are you doing here? Giving anti-action advice counters the purpose of the thread. If you oppose Kamala then there is no problem here for you to solve. Your feedback could only be useful in a place like Gab.

¹ It’s utter nonsense in the very least because you think a POTUS is just one person, not an entire administration. It’s also an absurdity to claim any two people are equal on the environment when one of them is a climate denier and the other is not. It’s a fundamentally rock stupid claim at its core, particularly when the climate denier demonstrated a neutering of the EPA his first term in office.

And beyond that it’s a failure to understand that a large number of people are inherently in play. Incompetence can only explain the idea that the republican party and democratic party are equals on anything but most particularly environnmental policy.

[–] JacobCoffinWrites@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Not at all. I shouldn't have expected the sarcasm to cary. Perhaps I'm jealous of the shield of those folks' pessimism (assuming any of it was said in good faith in the first place).

Edit: I will admit it wasn't a productive contribution to the conversation. Seeing the title call it a disaster got my temper after mostly seeing so many conversations on this instance about how none of it matters and we're all monsters for sullying ourselves trying to mitigate the damage with a vote. I might have also mixed you up for the mod of that community.