this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
901 points (98.9% liked)

Political Weirdos

741 readers
303 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
901
Did this MAGA weirdo just say he'd turn these GenZers into his sexual plaything? (slrpnk.net)
submitted 2 weeks ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/political_weirdos@lemmy.world
117 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shellbeach@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

Or doesn't know the meaning of concubines. Begging the question what _did_he mean?

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast"

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I’m guessing he thought it was a fancy term for slaves. Which is wrong in a lot of ways, but also just weird..

It’s the best read of it I can manage though..

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Nah bro. He’s just copped to tryna fuck kids. Just republican shit.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

I bet he was being polite and he actually wanted to write "you would be my bitches". Not polite, MAGA polite.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Or doesn’t know the meaning of concubines.

I don't know the meaning of that word either, but based on context I assume it's because I'm not into any sketchy shit.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's the step between mistress and partner.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh.......yeah, I was thinking it was much darker. It sounds like some kind of metalic tub that you put children in to rape them in the fields of Alaska at an oil rig job.

At least with mistress's and partners consent is a key factor.

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In several countries, and absolutely historically, it’s actually been a government-classified relationship status.

It just means people involved in a romantic and sexual relationship who are unwilling or unable to legally marry for whatever reason (because they are already married, because they aren’t legally qualified, such as one member is from a slave caste, etc)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concubinage

[–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's an old term for a pleasure slave.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

No, concubinage was typically consensual.

[–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 10 points 2 weeks ago

By definition of concubine, sure, but consensual is a far cry for most. I'm trying to remember the exact quote, but I'll paraphrase it here: 'In slave-owning societies, the vast majority of concubines were slaves.' https://archive.org/details/historicaldictio0000klei for the source.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

Historically consent has often been quite optional, when it comes to marriage, concubinage, and the like...