this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
149 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

37713 readers
509 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sentinian@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would assume the average school child is more concerned about instagram or tiktok vs other parts of the internet. I would not be against finding a way to limit access to other sites, but I would prefer a privacy respecting way. Just requiring an ID is a shitty solution and screws over adults more then it helps kids (they will find grandma's id.) If a privacy valuing solution is brought up I would be 1000% supporting it.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I think trchnical solution is not s problem, if we decide what needs to be applied we can do it.

If kid finds grandmother's id - it is simple enough, punish grandma for providing her id, it will teach adult to be responsible. Additionally, not all kids will be able to do it. I doubt they will follow us.

My opinion, eve if it is obvious, parents are responsible Punish them for not protecting their kids.

[–] ArcticCircleSystem@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that effectively restrict a lot of platforms to people age 16 or older? I am a bit worried that such an id law could cut off younger queer teens dealing with abuse that's severe enough to qualify as abuse in the academic sense, but not in the eyes of the law, from vital community... ~Strawberry

[–] Sentinian@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Yes the effects would be terrible for everyone, that's why I am against it.