this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
17 points (94.7% liked)

Canada

7200 readers
353 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He surely would reject any such comparison but, in a recent interview, Justin Trudeau briefly sounded just a little bit like Richard Nixon.

"The problem is right now that there is a silent majority that is a little bit silent, and maybe wondering whether it's actually a minority. And you got a lot of good, thoughtful people saying, you know, 'I don't have anything personal against the leader, but everyone seems to hate him because I see all these flags and therefore, you know, he must be on his way out or he must be unpopular,'" Trudeau told Village Media.

While Nixon, the 37th president of the United States, didn't coin the phrase, he did popularize the notion of a "silent majority" in a televised address about the war in Vietnam in 1969. Those words conjured up an image of a mass of voters who could not be heard over the din of the protesters and activists clamouring for political and social change.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah. Best case scenario I've felt would be that Trudeau resigns, the liberals bring in someone more popular that will effectively block Pierre Poppinfresh and hold onto a minority government.

Keeping PP from power isn't quite as imperative as Trump down south, but it's close. He's more Ron DeSantis than Trump.

[โ€“] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think my best case scenario is that Jagmeet Singh steps down, the NDP quickly select a leader that relates to the working class (something like a Tim Walz type) and they sweep the election on a workers rights grassroots push.

[โ€“] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Best case scenario...yes. But likely...not very.

The only thing that the bankers and CEOs that keep the Liberal coffer's full, and the Oil & Gas Companies (and now Russia apparently) that keep the Cons coffer's full, is a mutual hatred for the working man and for unions.

It would take a herculean effort, and a charismatic leader that we haven't seen since Layton, to bring the NDP into Official Opposition range, let alone leading it all.

I agree that that would be the best possible version of Canada. But greed will never allow it to happen.

[โ€“] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah, 0% chance this happens, but a man can dream, and vent online about our political situation.

[โ€“] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I'm still daydreaming of a Rachel Notley federal run

[โ€“] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

If the NDP and/or LPC only run candidates in ridings they're likely to win, that could help them elect both more NDP MPs and more LPC MPs, possibly keeping PP at bay. Of course that won't happen and we're gonna get vote split instead.

[โ€“] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

PP is aiming to rewrite the charter and is gunning for a full slate of conservative premiers.

[โ€“] fourish@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You can bet that when Kamala wins in the US the liberals will elect an indigenous female just because thatโ€™s what they do. As long as sheโ€™s competent no problem but if itโ€™s a diversity hire, screw them.

Iโ€™m centre in general and either slightly left or slightly right depending on the issue. Rampant political correctness and nanny government pisses me off something fierce though.