this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
847 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59756 readers
2971 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Most of the world’s video games from close to 50 years of history are effectively, legally dead. A Video Games History Foundation study found you can’t buy nearly 90% of games from before 2010. Preservationists have been looking for ways to allow people to legally access gaming history, but the U.S. Copyright Office dealt them a heavy blow Friday. Feds declared that you or any researcher has no right to access old games under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 185 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Industry groups argued that those museums didn’t have “appropriate safeguards” to prevent users from distributing the games once they had them in hand.

Good grief. Some of these games have been on the Internet longer than I have been alive. They are 100-fucking-percent already available on ROM sites. You're just shitting on people's enjoyment for the sake of shitting.

“The game industry’s absolutist position… forces researchers to explore extra-legal methods to access the vast majority of out-of-print video games that are otherwise unavailable,” the VGHF wrote.

The spice must flow, and I can assure you that it already does.

[–] ogeist@lemmy.world 91 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Industry groups argued that those museums didn’t have “appropriate safeguards” to prevent users from distributing the games once they had them in hand.

So libraries are also illegal? Books, DVDs, VHS, CDS, etc. You can replace games with any of those.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 122 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They've been actively fighting libraries over the years, with renewed fervor in the last decade. As numerous others have pointed out before--including the article I linked--if libraries hadn't already been such a long-standing concept for centuries, they would 100% not be allowed to come into existence nowadays. Hyper greed has poisoned every facet of modern society.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

hyper greed

You misspelled neoliberal capitalism

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

Libraries are clearly communist… or anarchist… either way, I hate it!

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We used to rent these games from Blockbuster Video! On DVD when we had DVD burners and little to no drm! How did it suddenly not become acceptable?

[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Lobbying. The greedy fucks will lobby until they get their way

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Physical rentals are still legal. This is only about the legality of online rom downloads.

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm speaking mainly of the distrust against the public having access for fear that we'd abuse it and not give them a cut. We can't have access to these things now, but we used to. Regardless of form, regardless of piracy.

It's more of a move to restrict ownership when you make a purchase, that has a farther reach than just games. I could see this being applied to cars, houses, etc. In that you only rent a license, and don't actually own anything. I see this as just a first step, and the logic they use to justify it doesn't make sense.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We can't have access to these things now, but we used to.

??? There was no change. It was always illegal. This was a petition to change it to be legal and the petition was denied.

Despite it being illegal, Internet Archive has hosted and I hope will continue to host rom collections like tiny best set go.

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Industry groups argued that those museums didn’t have “appropriate safeguards” to prevent users from distributing the games once they had them in hand.

And what exactly is stopping me from scanning library books and uploading them online? Are you going to ban libraries too?

Actually, let's not give them ideas.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 52 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They would love to ban libraries.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

If they didn't already exist, it's doubtful they would have been legal to make.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Isnt that what the InternetArchive did, disabled controlled lending during covid and got sued?

[–] el_bhm@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago

Physical books have no safeguards from photocopying.

I have more terrifying news about museums. We are talking pictures worth MILLIONS just waiting to be photographed.

[–] magikmw@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wait till they hear of scanners and copy machines. The books aren't safe either!

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Even worse. I've checked out digital eBooks and digital audiobooks from my local library. And I listened to those audiobooks for FUN. The AUDACITY!

Audacity is what I used to record those audiobooks so I could listen at my own pace, btw.