Asklemmy

43984 readers

799 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

320

Why are so many Pro-Palestine (I am pro-Palestine and anti-genocide) Americans refusing to vote for Harris due to her stance on Israel? (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

638 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As the title states I am confused on this matter. The way I see it, the USA has a two party system and in the next few weeks they’re either going to have Trump or Harris as president, come inauguration day. With this in mind doesn’t it make sense to vote for the person least likely to escalate the situation even more.

Giving your vote to an independent or worse not voting at all, just gives more of a chance for Trump to win the election and then who knows what crazy stuff he will allow, or encourage, Israel to get away with.

I really don’t get the logic. As sure nobody wants to vote for a party allowing these heinous crimes to be committed, but given you’re getting one of them shouldn’t you be voting for the one that will be the least horrible of the two.

Please don’t come at me with pro-Israeli rhetoric as this isn’t the post for that, I’m asking about why people would make such choices and I’m not up for debate on the Middle East, on this post, you can DM me for that.

Edit: Bedtime here now so will respond to incoming comments in the morning, love starting the day with an inbox full 😊.

Edit 2: This blew up, it’s a little overwhelming right now but I do intent on replying to everybody that took the time to comment. Just need to get in the right headspace.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The US needs to fix their voting system before they can start voting third party. It's probably even more difficult with Trump

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're more likely to get a socialist revolution than democrats and Republicans getting rid of FPTP at a significant enough level to matter.

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

That'd be cool

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The US needs to vote third party in order to fix the voting system.

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's too rigged

[–] gramophone_mind@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or is that something we keep telling people who are voting third party?

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah, doesn't seem like that

[–] gramophone_mind@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Funny though how I see it pulled out so often in response.

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah could be a common misconception or a misdirection

[–] Jikiya@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Maybe, but third party presidential, when there is no legislators is never going to happen, never going to be elected, and never get any bills passed. Aiming for the white house as the first stop is just silly.