this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
37 points (97.4% liked)
Formula 1
9059 readers
48 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donβt want to become formuladank.
Up next
2024 Calendar
Location | Date |
---|---|
πΊπΈ United States | 21-23 Nov |
πΆπ¦ Qatar | 29 Nov-01 Dec |
π¦πͺ Abu Dhabi | 06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm so confused, I always assume Horner is double speaking and shit talking but I can't quite figure out the angle here. Is it: "Go ahead and equalise the engines and fight amongst yourselves we have aero advantage anyway"?
Engine equalisation would cut development costs massively, figuratively speaking in any technology 95% of the performance is achieved with 50% of the budget, so the big spends are always on the tiny things that keep you ahead of the competition, if everyone is equalised then there is no reason to waste money on developments that get the extra 2 or 3 HP from the system.
Pareto efficiency for the win?
This sounds so sensible that I am still shocked that Christian "It wasn't me" Horner has said it π.
I think Horner is for it because he knows it will harm the competitors more than Red Bull.
The other angle I haven't seen suggested here is that this is a forward-looking insurance play from Horner. At the moment RBPT are winning off the back of development work done by Honda in previous years. Nonetheless, they are new to the engine game and there is likely some substantial concern that when the next engine regs come they will be left floundering.
By backing the equalisation they give themselves precedent to demand the same again a few years down the line if RB engines fall behind the pack. They are likely very confident in the rest of their current package, to the point that they can risk making the current situation more competitive in order to guard against future disaster.
I don't especially like Horner, but I think it's hard to argue that he's anything but an excellent team principle, possibly the best on the grid. If he's doing this there is zero chance it's for altruistic reasons - there is a play for RB here somewhere, it's just a case of figuring out what it is.
This makes the most sense to me. Never trust Horner.
I can see a few reasons why I think red bull won't be against this.
because they don't really want to make engines and don't want a repeat of 2014 with the next engine regulation change.
If I'm not mistaken Red Bull will be making their own engines from either 2024 or 2026? I'm sure I read they they are building that facility now.
Maybe he's concerned that their first engine will be down on power compared to the rest, in which case equalising would benefit him.
yeah they are because they have to. I'm sure they would prefer not to.
this is what it sounds like, Red Bull has Adrian Newey so might as well neutralize the engine advantage that Ferrari or Merc could possibly have