this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
765 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
3192 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (5 children)

And most importantly: How would they enforce that? Kids have been lying about their ages since the dawn of internet.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think they really need to.

Laws are often just an acknowledgement of a society's expectation.

"We've all decided that kids under 15 using social isn't great."

The fact that this law exists makes it infinitely b easier for parents to establish and maintain rules in their household, because peer pressure is minimised.

Yes, some kids will still use social before they're 15. Perhaps most kids. However, I think harmfully excessive use will be minimised.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago

Porn sites have age limits, we know this doesn't mean shit. No middleschooler gets condemned for watching porn.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

The enforcing part is where this is likely to get shitty. Once they establish this as a law they maybe will try and sue companies that don't provide an age check on their websites. Now if that is possible I am not sure, seeing as many of those are having HQs in Ireland or Netherlands due to tax reasons.

But if that is successful it would mean they actually have to check everyone's age by some means, which means collecting IDs. Which definitely is bad news for users, we all know that data won't be securely stored or deleted.

Not sure how else this could go down.

[–] fatalicus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Would probably require the sites to use Bank ID during signups from Norway.

Bank ID is a national system for confirming identity.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds dystopian as fuck. Also, they can just pretend they're not from Norway.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Now Meta not only knows your name and where you live and your darkest secrets but your legal ID too — fun!

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Not saying you might be right, but this could be solved with a simple API that returns yes/no for the age check, without providing additional information.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 3 points 4 weeks ago

And this is the problem with any age verification online... there's always some lurking privacy invasion. It's for your own good.

[–] Oaksey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Since Leisure Suit Larry at least. ;) Since alcohol sales were restricted to adults? Since.. ?

[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know I have been surfing the hub ever since I was 13

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Just like everyone on the internet.