science

14767 readers

104 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

m3t00@lemmy.world

Joleee@lemmy.world

laverabe@lemmy.world

DeadPand@midwest.social

275

Many voters are willing to accept misinformation from political leaders – even when they know it’s factually inaccurate, if they believe the statements evoke a deeper, more important “truth.” (theconversation.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by solrize@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Many voters are willing to accept misinformation from political leaders – even when they know it’s factually inaccurate. According to our research, voters often recognize when their parties’ claims are not based on objective evidence. Yet they still respond positively, if they believe these inaccurate statements evoke a deeper, more important “truth.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Let me frame this like so:

It's just another example of capitalist for-profit corporations that maximize profits while offloading their negative externalities onto the rest of us.

They know they're making money when they tell lies and they don't care about the downstream effects. For some the downstream effects might even be desirable.

Another way to frame it is: corporate media makes money, with informing (or disinforming) the public as a byproduct.