Fediverse

52 readers

1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 2 years ago

Twitter alternatives for the Musk-averse (www.theverge.com)

submitted 1 year ago by realcaseyrollins@kbin.projectsegfau.lt to c/fediverse@kbin.social

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Twitter isn’t the only social network around — here are some others.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Terevos@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Facebook was invite only. The you had to have an edu email address. Then they finally opened it up for everyone.

Exclusivity can drive marketing for a time. People want in on what only some can have.

[–] blivet@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Up to a point. Google+ was invite only for so long that by the time it became available to the general public no one cared anymore. When people signed in with their new accounts they couldn’t find anyone they knew, and they never came back.

Really stupid on Google’s part, because they launched at a time when people were angry with Facebook for selling private user data, and a lot of users probably would have moved to G+ if they had been able to.

[–] Terevos@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's a number of things they messed up with Google+. I did like their share circles concept.