Comic Strips

12550 readers

4323 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
The comic must be a complete story.
If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
You may post comics from others or your own.
If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
Politeness.
Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.

Web of links

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
!memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lawrence@lemmy.world

1071

The worst (i.imgur.com)

submitted 4 weeks ago by TehBamski@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world

65 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Georgeism would not increase your overall tax burden, it would shift taxation away from things like income and sales tax and toward land value (excluding improvements like your home). Your overall tax burden would only increase if you occupy a larger then average share of the total land in existence (by value, not physical area), and for the large majority of people it would decrease appreciably.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It does seem like it would be a reasonable tax scheme but it would have to be carefully balanced for the type of use for the land. It'd make sense to charge more for a factory making a lot of value for the economy compared to a high density residential building occupying the same area. I personally prefer mixed use zoning to make land use more efficient though so it'd be interesting to see how that'd go.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think one of the benefits of Land Value Tax is that an empty lot costs as much as a highrise or factory. It heavily disincentivizes leaving a property undeveloped or poorly developed, like with parking lots or abandoned buildings.

That being said, it would also put pressure on underdeveloped properties, like your home on a street with rising property values. Some limitations would almost certainly be necessary.

This could also be solved with better zoning, but most of our social problems could be fixed with better governance of some kind. Land Value Tax is one of the proposed methods that would need less fixes to make work and (hopefully) be harder to co-opt for wealth extraction.

I'd accept trying anything though, instead of more tax cuts and funding cuts.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

That being said, it would also put pressure on underdeveloped properties, like your home on a street with rising property values.

Yeah. I feel like people would get out and vote if they understood this.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago

and for the large majority of people it would decrease appreciably.

I'm still concerned, since I'm planning to own a huge international chain of retail stores when I strike it rich and become a billionaire. (This is Sarcasm.)

Great explanation. Thank you.