Comic Strips

12538 readers

3744 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
The comic must be a complete story.
If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
You may post comics from others or your own.
If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
Politeness.
Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.

Web of links

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
!memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lawrence@lemmy.world

1071

The worst (i.imgur.com)

submitted 4 weeks ago by TehBamski@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world

65 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Personally I think the landlords would just increase the rent while saying their interests are literally the only ones that need protection from the state because they generate all the revenue but can't blame them for trying.

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Generally speaking landlords charge as much in rent as the market will bear. If they could get away with charging more they would already be doing so.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Right, and when tenants aren't paying taxes?

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Rents will presumably rise accordingly, and then be captured in the form of a tax that is both very difficult to evade and no longer harms economic efficiency

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think that's a rather hopeful view of the situation, but, on the other hand, I guess it would also help real estate bubbles from forming so there's that at least.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago

Right, and when tenants aren't paying taxes?

Then tenants will keep more money, in any case where there's any competition in housing.

And in any case where there's no competition in the housing supply, tenants will still be unharmed because they're already paying the maximum amount that landlords can get away with.

It's risk free for tenants.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 weeks ago

Counterintuitively, a LVT wouldn't distort prices because the supply of land is fixed.