politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
3 weeks left and you're still constantly trying to sow dissent and disfavor on Harris with masquerades of play-nice bullshitting. You seem to be engaged in constant mental gymnastics adjusted to whatever thread topic is available to whataboutKamala in a negative light.
Do you have any self introspection or is it all high rpm cognitive dissonace at this point?
I haven't looked at his post history so I can't say if you're right about that, but at least in this case his comment seems entirely on topic and appropriate and I'm not seeing an issue with it. The article is literally about Harris not condemning Trump's deportation plans and tacit support of the deportation program that Biden ran.
Look at the post history, that's the entire context of my comment, I see gsf all the time on the blame train, even while they sprinkle salient points that seem rational here and there.
How exactly did you interpret the opening line of 'still constantly trying to sow dissent' other than to have a broader context than just this particular post. Hand waving it away on their behalf sure seems more like taking part in the gymnastics.
Because you said:
which implies they're twisting the topic to be about blaming Harris rather than Trump which they're very clearly not doing in this case. Leveling that accusation in a different context might be fair but in this case you're the one that comes off as engaging in mental gymnastics. This entire article is about criticizing Harris so comments doing the same are on topic. Your comment isn't even defending her, but rather attempting to attack the motives of someone agreeing with the article.
For better or worse Harris is who we're stuck with if we want to avoid a fascist dictatorship, but burying your head in the sand and engaging in personal attacks against anyone who points out that she's flawed and her policies aren't great isn't really helping either, it just makes you seem a bit unhinged.