this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1435 readers
186 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last week's thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

v light, only weakly techtakes material, but I'm immature enough to want to share:

spoilerI just got a sales email from "Richard at Autodesk" titled "Hear from the probing experts"

Does anyone read these things before or after they're sent?

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does anyone read these things before or after they’re sent?

It sounds like spam - by my guess, they usually aren't read at all.

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks to the power of Technology(tm) we can have an LLM generate spam, an automailer send it out to millions, where an automated spam filter can identify them and hide them in a separate inbox to be automatically deleted in a couple of days. Of course the technology isn't perfect and sometimes someone sees one of these ads and, I assume, spends money on a product. But I have faith that these problems are solvable and we'll be able to totally automate email spam to no longer interact with human beings at any point. Once that's done we can apply the same methodologies to weekly internal memos, daily team meetings, and even unsolicited dick pics. Imagine never needing to take or see pictures of a stranger's junk ever again while still massively scaling up the number of unsolicited dick pics in flight at any given time.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago

and even unsolicited dick pics.

But what about the dck pcks?