this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
792 points (99.9% liked)

Technology

37713 readers
370 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are few things quite as emblematic of late stage capitalism than the concept of "planned obsolescence".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Almost certainly not allowed, schools are responsible for privacy and security on these devices.

[–] buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Any standard desktop linux is more private and secure than google spyware

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And as soon as the IT guy at school installs Linux on these machines, he's responsible for said privacy and security. And he's a lot easier to sue than Google if something goes wrong.

[–] Hellebert@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is exactly why right here, cost aside.

I would not hand out hundreds of Chromebooks to kids running some Linux distro I installed even if I could. It's critical to have full manufacturer support in these types of environments.

[–] Hephoh2@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Yes but there might already be personal data on them from the child, so they cannot give the chromebooks out before wiping them, which seems hard to do so they just bin em.