this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
57 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15914 readers
10 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anarcho_blinkenist@hexbear.net 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Hungry Americans expect you to lower food prices the minute you are in the White House. However, this directive may not be necessary as the hunger issue will soon resolve itself.

some will afford food, some will perish, and the market will stabilize. the invisible hand wins again

Since most Americans have a couple of years of extra padding, the best approach might be to encourage reduced consumption; higher prices for food and beverages could curb waste and excess.

speech-rubi-r-1 "actually the poor are fat, and so when you think about it going hungry might be kinda good for them!" speech-rubi-r-3 capitalist-laugh
this is just the bald-face PR (ie. propaganda) of a razor-toothed sociopath to hand-waive rising food costs against stagnant wages (ie. falling real wages), not realizing they're sharpening the guillotines with every word.

[–] Tomboymoder@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are they really saying “food is too expensive, so buy an even more expensive drug that keeps you from being hungry”?

[–] VILenin@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

It seems contradictory until the real position comes into focus: “give me more money. now. eco-porky

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

Yep. Truly incredible. This is that capitalist "innovation" they talk about

[–] hotcouchguy@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Maeve@midwest.social 13 points 1 month ago

Those drugs also cause serious health problems and death, from what I've read.

[–] VILenin@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

the hunger issue will soon resolve itself.

I don’t see how this could be interpreted in any way other than “the savage filthy ungrateful poors troubling us so will soon finally depart this mortal plane porky-happy

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

“There is, and always has been, a widespread belief among the more comfortable classes that the poverty and suffering of the masses are due to their lack of industry, frugality, and intelligence. This belief, which at once soothes the sense of responsibility and flatters by its suggestion of superiority, is probably even more prevalent in countries like the United States, where all men are politically equal, and where, owing to the newness of society, the differentiation into classes has been of individuals rather than of families, than it is in older countries, where the lines of separation have been longer, and are more sharply, drawn."

  • Henry George.

Even liberals realize this stench anywhere