this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
45 points (92.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36143 readers
1278 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But it does influence people, if only subconsciously.

The point of it isn't to say "look at this weak old man, he could never have committed these acts".

It's to hopefully sway a jury into thinking that they're so old they're not a threat, and maybe create a deadlock. Then, if that fails, then to hopefully garner a lighter sentence, for much the same reason, that they're no longer a threat.

It is bullshit, neither of the two you used as examples had any mobility issues before arrest, and any that they might have developed afterwards wood not be as severe as they made it look. Mind you, the stress, the physical demands of processing, the extra travel and such could cause someone to have extra problems. My crippled ass could barely walk to the car on my cane after the last time I got called for jury duty. There's a lot of walking around on concrete floors and sitting in horrible seats at courthouses. It'll fuck your back up.

But you aren't going from walking without a cane to needing a walker in the amount of time that passed. Not without a damn big reason.

But think about it, when you see some old dude hobbling along, is your first thought really going to be "I bet they're faking it"? Even if you know they are faking it, that image of a weak person plays on prejudices of thought that damn near everyone has. Look at the idiots that scream about "boomers" this and "boomers" that, like everyone over a certain age is flawed. We all have prejudices of thought, assumptions, and it's damn near impossible to completely control them and ignore what our eyes see.

You might achieve that when it's fresh in your mind, but the next time you go to the store and see some old lady on a cane, are you really going to be thinking about how she could be doing yoga and pulled a muscle; or are you going to be thinking about how that poor old lady is in rough shape because she's old, and that's all you can see until/unless you stop and think about it? Most people, they never see an old person as a threat.

Man, I barely have any gray in my beard, and I'm a fucking sasquatch. I've still got arms bigger than some people's thighs, and just by me using a cane (and I need one, if I want to not fall when my leg gives out), people react very different than when I'm leaned up against a wall with my cane strapped across my back. On cane, they just look away as fast as they can. With it not in use, I get suspicious looks, and adults hurrying away, and the occasional security person asking why I'm just standing against the wall.

I've seen it hundreds of times when I'm out with people from my disability support group. You let my buddy Spider get out of his scooter, and him being a small guy with a twisted spine on a cane is still not going to have people walking around him the way they do with the scooter. They'll give him more room, but not the same. The guys and gals that have less visible disabilities have their own issues with people treating them different when they're using a mobility aid compared to when they aren't.

It's a thing. We all build up these links in our heads, associations with things we've experienced that we use to evaluate new things. Ignoring those etched in patterns is hard, even when you're aware of it.

It's not going to work perfectly, or every time, but it does happen

[–] Don_Dickle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

OK just so I get this straight as a healthy 40 years black lesbian if I ever get caught up in the legal system I can walk in with a cane or walker or something else showing i am fucked up but i am not. And I will get a lesser sentence?

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

No guarantees. Look at Weinstein. Sucker is still in jail.

It's all about believability vs the crime, with any biases in the jury and judge.

They're is a fairly common thing where the harder it is to imprison someone based on their disability, the more likely they are to get more lenient sentences, but that's still not foolproof.

If you're faking it, chances are that no judge is going to be fooled unless there's a long history of disability. Juries might be easier to fool to some degree, but you'd still need to convince them that your disability is evidence you didn't commit the crime to be able to rely on it, and that's going to be hard.

It's otherwise rolling dice that are weighted against you.