this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
361 points (97.9% liked)

Work Reform

10134 readers
118 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EscanortheArrogant@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago (2 children)

62% over 6 years, so like 10% a year which is still not bad, but not the same 62% lump sum like the headline suggests.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but this puts the wage cap at like $63/hour. That's ridiculously good for a blue collar job. I've been in the same field for around 16 years and I'd be ecstatic if I were making half that amount, and my job requires a lot of certifications and ongoing training hours to stay certified.

That's over $130,000/year. Plus, they hit their cap after just 6 years. I couldn't imagine making that much after just 6 years somewhere. They did a great job. Laborers everywhere should be making money like this, instead of the people sitting in chairs with lumbar support complaining that the ac is two degrees warmer than what they'd like while standing next to the corporate keureg coffee machine.

[–] Thassodar@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

But knowing how shitty companies are they'll likely make some excuse to fire people before they get close to their 6 year maximum. It's similar to how fast food places avoid hiring someone full time by scheduling them for 35 hours a week instead of 40.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That happens at McDonald's. It never happens at strong union jobs. You fire a union worker, it has to be well documented, by the book, and for a damned good reason. There's no chance of getting fired for bullshit reasons in something like a dock workers union. You also won't be getting reduced hours.

[–] Thassodar@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I know unions, my dad was a union VP for over a decade. I've seen how companies can be shitty even if you have the union backing you.

[–] kmaismith@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

My wife worked at a grocery store and as i heard their union boss golfed with the CEO of the grocery chain… as i understand it that was HR masquerading as a union, by the time she left it sure was acting the part too

[–] Lux18@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Wait so any new hires after this deal was made would not be included? Wouldn't new hires also be in the union?

That would seem like a pretty big deal if true.