this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
845 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59308 readers
5174 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Should probably add this info about Mozilla funding almost exclusively from Google but at least they haven't disabled mv2 extensions yet. Even though they put in a fucking opt-out ad telemetry setting in recent releases.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't think it should've been opt-out, but Mozilla's ad metrics development is very much the direction ads on the web should go in. It is impossible to determine who you are from the data. They've truly done a good job on creating an ad model that's privacy friendly, and would be a material improvement to the web.

It's a way to still have ad revenue funding the content we all consume, while also still maintaining privacy. It's a good thing. It's just the opt-out aspect for existing installs that's bad.

That said, I'm personally a proponent of just using adblock lol

[–] TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

I also use adblocking at multiple levels so it wasn't a huge thing for me (been blocking Pocket and other bullshit for years at the dns and network levels) but I still feel like Mozilla witnessed Google going for broke with killing mv2 and inline ads on YouTube and decided wellll our existing users probably wouldn't notice or care if we slipped in an opt-out fuckery... But we did. Immediately.

For any browser trying to sell itself as "the only privacy browser on the market" this was a dumb fucking move by any metric. Like why not just openly admit we're going with the Brave browser model?

[–] Klaymore@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is Chrome's ad telemetry opt-in?

[–] TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

No it's not. But if we're hoping Firefox will be better in some way we'd expect more from them. Wouldn't we?