Asklemmy

43963 readers

2379 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

133

If you could only have 1GB of entertainment data, what would it be? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

121 comments fedilink hide all child comments

You are going away, to some place isolated... in space, of course. You will only be around one other person. You can take an allotment if 1GB of personal media with you (text, video, music, games, pics, etc.) that you will be able to access in your free time indefinitely at will.

The other person will also take 1GB with them, but you won't be able to talk to them until you're on the journey.

You will have access to any knowledge resources to perform your function and keep you alive. You will never return to a point where you can get new external media. Any additional media you ever access would have to be created by you and or your travel partner with what you have access to.

You will also not know the sex of your partner, but they have willingly taken the same risks to embark on the journey as yourself, and will have a similar mission.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Would use 1/2 on ebooks, 1/2 on passible quality music I'd give up some quality for size reduction. I'd probably save a little space for a sudoku game.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm going to willingly misread this as you wanting AI "compressed" ebooks lol

[–] Schmeckinger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have read somewhere that some text can be compressed incredibly efficiently in some AI models. The issue being that the compressed data is worthless without the model and power to recover it.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

https://www.hendrik-erz.de/post/why-gzip-just-beat-a-large-language-model

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

20 years ago, I used to have custom playlists that I'd load onto a 64mb SD card for my commute. A 64kbit wma file is surprisingly listenable. You can fit more than a standard album onto 64mb. I'm trying to remember now how much, probably 20-25 songs?

At that compression rate, I expect you can get a few hundred songs into half a GB. Of course, picking them would be its own challenge! It'd be the most curated playlist in history.