this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
619 points (97.4% liked)

Firefox

17952 readers
188 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LWD@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the comment is going "grrr ai"

You asked how Mozilla betrayed users, so let's focus on that. I don't care about the ways they haven't betrayed users, in the same way I don't care about how Seamus built a bridge.

second, that chatbot thing you're crying about is>>> only in nightly

No, it's in Firefox 130. I know this because I use Firefox.

it most likely will never make it into a non-nightly release

LOL

Also, when i say that a model is open source, i am referring to the binary being downloadable

This is not what open source means. If that's the case, Microsoft Windows is open source. Go nuts.

You clearly saw the word "ai" and decided that mozilla was as bad as google, without looking into it at all.

People aren't blindly saying all AI is bad. They were pointing at a specific thing. Do not strawman.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No, it's in Firefox 130. I know this because I use Firefox.

it's in the "labs" section, its disingenuous to imply it isnt. I was wrong to say its only in nightly, but its still an opt-in experimental feature.

Also, truncating my arguments in quotes to make me look stupid and trying to exclude any facts you dont like is a dick move, and you know it, i'm not going to respond to the rest of this because you are clearly not arguing in good faith.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

it's in the "labs" section, its disingenuous to imply it isnt.

You're the one who volunteered the claim that it was in Nightly. Not me. It's crazy you're calling me disingenuous for using the same language as you did. This is tone policing at a whole new level.

truncating my arguments in quotes to make me look stupid and trying to exclude any facts you dont like is a dick move, and you know it

This is a bold claim without evidence. If you have multi-pronged points that require everything to be true, and the first part of it is wrong, I don't feel like I have to go over the rest. And if you're doing whataboutism, I have no problem with skipping that either.