this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
230 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

34478 readers
998 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

STOCKHOLM, Sept 25 (Reuters) - Vienna-based advocacy group NOYB on Wednesday said it has filed a complaint with the Austrian data protection authority against Mozilla accusing the Firefox browser maker of tracking user behaviour on websites without consent.

NOYB (None Of Your Business), the digital rights group founded by privacy activist Max Schrems, said Mozilla has enabled a so-called “privacy preserving attribution” feature that turned the browser into a tracking tool for websites without directly telling its users.

Mozilla had defended the feature, saying it wanted to help websites understand how their ads perform without collecting data about individual people. By offering what it called a non-invasive alternative to cross-site tracking, it hoped to significantly reduce collecting individual information.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The answer will always from now on be 'yes', for every annoying privacy invading toggle you have to change, it is in the best interest of the software creators to force you to do it in the way that benefits them most.

Our opinions are no longer as important as their ability to harvest our data.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Our opinions are no longer as important as their ability to harvest our data.

Either you control your hardware and software OR some parasite does.

Your choice folks

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Ok I'll just go grab some sand and refine it into silicon then bake my own chips then code my own kernel and OS and applications because that's the only way to 'control' it.

Companies need to be held to regulatory standards about our private data, and the ONLY reason those regulations don't exist is because every FUCKDAMN politician in the world was born before TV had color

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 1 hour ago

It's mainly because of "perks."

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 2 hours ago

I don't disagree but bro... We both know dsddy Sam ain't saving Z slaves... This here country got elites with slaver mentality

[–] Ferris@infosec.pub 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

This is how you get Temple OS

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

No, schizophrenia is how you get Temple OS

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Mad dude made great OS due to paranoia...

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

No it was a shitty OS with very VERY little hardware support,

and he built it because the voices in his head told him to build a temple and he was too lazy to be a carpenter.

Have you actually installed it? Because I have. It's BARELY an OS

The 'security' mumbo jumbo is mainly to cover his networking incompetence

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 hour ago

God damn my man... Hot take after hot take today haha