this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
1344 points (97.2% liked)

People Twitter

5274 readers
688 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

always heard printers were the most insecure tech to have, but that was decades ago, we got all sorts of devices nowadays that could be worse

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

You'd be insecure too if everyone loudly hated you with a burning passion

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

Honestly they’re still pretty vulnerable. Maybe firmware is a bit better, but it’s a configuration thing that often gets overlooked in corporate networks. The amount of open SMTP relays I’ve run across in printers is a bit ridiculous, but it’s always fun to start phishing people with internal emails.

[–] snowsuit2654@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Not really a concern for home use if it's not networked. If it is networked, make sure you at least have it behind your firewall, disable any remote access/remote printing features, and ideally update the firmware as well.