this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
496 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

59204 readers
3333 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] housepanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com 163 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What really is upsetting is that Musk has billions with which he can use on a lark. Most of us would consider 100,000 an impossible risk. Billionaires are the problem. I repeat - The problem.

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Shame these guys don't build a hospital or something instead.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Kichae@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And that would preclude them being billionaires

[–] bafomdad@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

and being a billionaire requires being sociopathic

"But where is the fun of that?" says Elon Musk probably.

[–] mohKohn@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I mean, as much as I think gates/bezos have abhorrent business practices, they do both have fairly large charitable foundations, and iirc, both have actually built literal hospitals with their money.

[–] JimmyJazz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Bold of you to assume they wouldn't find some way to fuck that up too

[–] Alphadef@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You really want Musk to be in charge where people's lives are at stake?

[–] LegendofDragoon@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

And it's not like American hospitals don't make money hand over fist

[–] Bahalex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] v_krishna@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

There's also the UC Beniof Childrens Hospital

[–] Shit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Bahalex@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He didn’t build it, but yea his name is on it because of his money. Not that PR money means he has morals. Although, it is a hospital for real human people, not other lizard types.

[–] Shit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Just the name really is a mouthful to say seriously.

[–] itsnotlupus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, it really was renamed after the Zuckerbergs, as buildings sometimes are at the request of a large donator seeking posterity.

See Wikipedia:

In November 2008, San Francisco voters approved an $887.4 million general obligation bond for the General Hospital rebuild, work began in 2009, and was expected to be finished in 2015.

In 2015, Facebook founder and CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, and his wife Priscilla Chan gave $75 million to help fund equipment and technology for the new hospital.

[–] WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think you'd want any part of a hospital that Elon Musk was involved in establishing.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

The rich and powerful have always been the problem for thousands of years. Somehow, we forgot that for a time.