this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
81 points (88.6% liked)

Technology

59308 readers
5559 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It feels like every few months there's a new tech "revolution" being hyped up as the future. Besides AI, what’s the most overhyped trend in tech right now? For me, it’s the constant buzz around the metaverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Quantum computing? The hype isn't so bad lately and I'm somewhat optimistic but it's worth a mention.

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I feel like it's hyped just enough. It does have the potential to revolutionize computing but we have no practical applications for it at the current point in its development. There's only so much you can hype something that can't even act as a simple calculator better than a handheld calculator can.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

it has the potential to revolutionize some optimization problems that are hard to solve classically. It's going to be practically useless for the average user.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'd to say that the quality of the hype is completely out of whack. People are expecting the current generation of generative neural networks to do things that they really can't.

The ammount of total excitement is probably actually too low if you group GNNs with AGI, though.