this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
1053 points (97.1% liked)

196

16597 readers
1795 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
1053
Biology rule (slrpnk.net)
submitted 2 months ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
149 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I cringe every time I hear another guy refer to women like this

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

with "this person" or "a BMW driver" as a maybe-neutral-but-also-likely-male coded qualifier.

If this is "likely male coded" how exactly do you suggest referring to other drivers in a neutral way?

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

How about other driver?

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I try to use "driver" or "person".

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

How are "this person" and "a BMW driver" likely male coded while "person" and "driver" are fine? It sounds to me like you're just assuming negative intent in others, while your own use of the same words is fine because you know what you mean.