Networking

436 readers

1 users here now

This is a community dedicated to all types of computer networking (physical/virtual/cloud/etc.)

Computers use common communication protocols over digital interconnections to communicate with each other. These interconnections are made up of telecommunication network technologies based on physically wired, optical, and wireless radio-frequency methods that may be arranged in a variety of network topologies.

Helpful Links:

Computer Network (Wikipedia)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to networking
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Try to keep discussions on topic
No spam of tools/companies/advertisements.
It’s OK to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the community should not be self-promotion.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

RandomDevOpsDude@programming.dev

250 million-plus unused IPv4 addresses should be left alone, argues network boffin • The Register (www.theregister.com)

submitted 1 week ago by ruffsl@programming.dev to c/networking@programming.dev

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Tests show it's just too hard to put the unused 240/4 block to work

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ruffsl@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Any particular reason that those OEMs made that decision when releasing those boxes? Was that range blacklisted in firmware because of the legacy specification? I thought the spec just forebode range's public allocation, but not necessarily its internal use.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

I think that's what it means: that firmware respects the spect and doesn't route that range – I doubt you wouldn't be able to use it on your LAN.