this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
935 points (95.1% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3725 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Plavatos@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, this is just down there with the right making fun of Kamala's laugh.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Eh, don’t care. Literally everything and anything weird or gross about trump is fair game. Dude is a psychopathic fascist pedophile. There are court cases about it that were only ~~dismissed~~ (correction) dropped because he threatened to murder the families of the girls involved. Don’t be an apologist for that.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Eh, don’t care.

"I don't have values, I only have a team."

Pitiful ideologues.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, I have a team. It’s called “not a fascist”.

The other team is the fascists.

I know I’m not being civil when I say this, but you're verging into a category that does not deserve an iota of respect: Do not fucking come in here with that false equivalence. Do not be a fascist apologist.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 42 seconds ago)

What a surprise, you consider your team the good guys and the other the bad guys, lmao.

If you had values, you'd recognize shitty/stupid behavior no matter who is doing it. By giving your side a pass for behavior you'd absolutely criticize the other side for, you prove that you have no actual values. It's team loyalty over integrity. Your comment just reinforced that.

By the way, calling out "he's stinky!" as childish, which it objectively is, is not fucking FASCISM APOLOGY, lmaoooooooo. Ideologues are so over the top, hahahaha, holy shit! Listen to yourself, for crying out loud.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

No it's definitely not the same. A tan suit is just a matter of taste (pretty good taste if you ask me), and a laugh is part of you, it can't really be changed, not honestly anyway. But nobody is just a "stinky" person, that's a reflection of a lack of hygiene, a skill and habit that every competent adult and older child should have mastered, let alone a candidate for the highest office. How can he care for his constituents if he apparently doesn't care for himself?

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

Exactly. It's pathetic how little self-awareness people can have when blinded by political fealty.

Just like the stupid 'nicknames' people think they're so clever making up and repeating, when all it's doing is showing that that's someone who merits zero attention from any mature adult. Durr hurr Obummer, durr hurr DEMONcrats, durr hurr ReTHUGlicans, durr hurr orange, durr hurr SCAMala, etc. etc.

In a way, I don't mind because it's just an easy way to identify people who should not be taken seriously, lol.