this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
/kbin meta
16 readers
2 users here now
Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign
founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Same. Honestly, I think it's a bit rude to come in and demand that the system change to suit us. This isn't reddit.
I'd be interested to see how well this actually works out. There's a lot less random "I disagree" downvoting on here, I've noticed. And the trouble with using downvotes as a disagree button is that they also affect visibility of a comment. Controversial comments shouldn't just be hidden away in the depths of the thread, because those can be where the more interesting ideas are. If somebody deserves to be downvoted (because they're trolling, posting low effort garbage, or being hateful), I don't think people will have too much issue downvoting them publicly.
As another user pointed out, what about an LGBT person wanting to upvote something but not feeling safe if someone knows their username? Or a woman living in a place with abortion bounties wanting to upvote something about how to get help, but being afraid to?
Or someone with an abusive spouse who might read between the lines (correctly or incorrectly) of what you upvote/downvote and get angry about it?
There are a lot of highly significant real world ramifications to having your vote history publicly accessible. Losing your job and life or death consequences far outweigh the online voting system considerations.
The possible problems caused by this FAR outweigh the possible benefits. People are just not thinking this through enough to see how badly it can go.